(
NaturalNews) Infectious diseases that the system insists
have been mostly eradicated due to the advent of vaccines are starting to
reemerge, with much of the blame for this being levied on the unvaccinated, who
are automatically assumed to be the culprits. But a deeper look into the
history of vaccines, how they work and what level of long-term protection they
truly provide reveals that
these golden calves of modern medicine are actually
the vehicles through which infectious disease is being spread, with vaccinated
individuals as the primary disease carriers.
It is the opposite of what we have all been told for decades
about the nature of vaccines -- that they produce immunity to diseases that
might otherwise kill you, is one common claim, as is the assumption that
refusing vaccines leaves one prone to both catching and spreading otherwise
uncommon infectious diseases. These and other modern medical myths about
vaccines pervade mainstream thinking, and yet they have absolutely no basis in
sound science.
In an extensive rebuttal to a 2012 article written by Forbes'
Steven Salzberg that blamed a whooping cough outbreak in the Northwest on
unvaccinated children, Dr. Paul G. King, Ph.D., of FAME Systems deconstructs
the popular misconception that infectious disease reemergence is the result of
people not getting vaccinated. On the contrary, it is the vaccination schedule
itself, which the federal government has been coercing people into complying
with for nearly the entire last century, that is ultimately leading to and
driving these outbreaks.
"Salsberg is simply using a longstanding 'straw man'
created long ago by his fellow vaccine apologists to divert the public's
attention from the reality that... the current pertussis vaccines are neither
effective in providing those inoculated with them long-term protection from
contracting whooping cough nor... cost effective," explains Dr. King in
his paper.
Vaccines as destroyers of natural immunity
One thing that few people, including many health
professionals, fail to understand is that vaccines override the body's innate,
or mucosal, immune system. Also known as non-specific immunity, innate immunity
is our bodies' primary line of defense against all types of bacteria, toxins
and other harmful invaders -- the gatekeeper, if you will, that protects the
body's adaptive immune system from having to face these intruders directly.
Under ideal conditions, the innate immune system kicks into
high gear at the first sign of a threat, blocking pathogens from getting past
the nose, mouth, digestive tract or other bodily entry point. If for some
reason the innate immune system fails at this task, the adaptive immune system
picks up where it left off, adapting, as its name implies, to tackle the
specific threat.
But this natural immune response is thwarted by vaccines,
which intentionally bypass the innate immune system and go straight for the
adaptive immune system. The resultant immune response is both unnatural and
completely out of order, generating only temporary and often incomplete
immunity as opposed to the lifelong immunity garnered from natural exposure.
"Whereas natural recovery from many infectious diseases
usually stimulates lifetime immunity, vaccines only provide temporary
protection and most vaccines require 'booster' doses to extend vaccine-induced
artificial immunity," says Barbara Loe Fisher, president and co-founder of
the National Vaccine Information Center.
The same is true for vaccines against pertussis, or whooping
cough, which Dr. King, through his extensive research, found only provide a few
years of limited protection as opposed to a lifetime of full protection in
unvaccinated individuals who contract the disease naturally. The former have to
continually get booster shots to maintain their immunity, while the latter are
essentially immune for life after contracting the disease once.
"[A]t best, the current views are that the 'protection'
provided by 'pertussis' vaccination lasts no more than 3 years in some
percentage of those who are 'fully' vaccinated and initially protected,"
wrote Dr. King. "In the pre-vaccination era, having a case of whooping
cough and recovering from it conservatively provided 10 to 50 years of
protection from a re-infection that resulted in a clinical case of whooping
cough caused by either B. pertussis or B. parapertussis."
In other words, unvaccinated individuals who contract mild
whooping cough at a young age end up developing lifelong immunity to the
disease without the need for a vaccine, and they also never become carriers of
the disease. Vaccinated individuals, on the other hand, will never develop
lifelong immunity, and will continually have to receive "booster"
shots as protection, which the data shows is not always reliable or foolproof
and can even lead to vaccine-induced health problems.
"Unlike the natural disease which appears to confer
lifelong immunity, present day pertussis vaccines confer only partial and
relative transient protection," wrote Drs. James W. Bass and Stephen R.
Stephenson in a 1987 study entitled The return of pertussis. "A high
degree of protection persists for 3 years, decreasing thereafter for 12 years
after which little or no protection is evident."
Vaccines as carriers of disease
If subpar, temporary immunity was the only downside of
getting vaccinated, it would be one thing. But the fact of the matter is that
vaccinated individuals often end up becoming carriers of the diseases against
which they were vaccinated, which is evident from decades of scientific data
showing that the current vaccination schedule is directly responsible for
bringing back all of these diseases that the media insists were eradicated by
vaccines.
"[T]he current DTaP/Tdap vaccination program in the USA
is increasing the percentages of cases of whooping cough that are either caused
by B. parapertussis or, as some are beginning to claim, caused by mutated
strains of B. pertussis that evade the protective effects of multiple
time-displaced inoculations with the current DTaP/Tdap vaccines," explains
Dr. King. "[V]accination with a 'pertussis component'-containing vaccine
produces some low level of 'B. pertussis' carriers ['Pertussis Harrys'] who...
can and do spread B. pertussis to others."
The recent whooping cough outbreaks in California,
Washington, New York and elsewhere also serve as proof of this, as the vast
majority of infected individuals in each of these cases had already been
"fully" vaccinated for the disease. Not surprisingly, health
authorities have been quiet about this inconvenient truth, leading the public
to erroneously assume that the unvaccinated are responsible.
"[T]he reality is that more than 75% of the cases of
whooping cough in outbreaks in Washington State since 2002 reportedly have been
occurring in 'fully' vaccinated individuals, and this reality continues to be
true in the 2012 'epidemic,'" adds Dr. King. "Further, the percentage
in the current outbreaks that have a confirmed case of B. pertussis has not
been disclosed -- nor is the percentage reported that have a confirmed case of
B. parapertussis or another organism that can cause whooping cough."
For those already infected, Dr. King suggests supplementing
with high doses of vitamin C, which he says eliminates the "whoop"
and reduces the duration of the disease, as well as taking high doses of
natural vitamin D3, which enables the body's immune system to produce
site-specific antibiotics to target whooping cough organisms in the respiratory
system while protecting gastrointestinal flora, which would otherwise be
destroyed by synthetic antibiotics.
Thanks for stopping by. Remember to share! :)
To get e-mail notifications of new posts from this blog, contact me at: genevieve-parry@live.com
